Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > That link is not broken - it points to a file containing the linked > heading. It just happens to be the same Org file.
I am struggling to understand. The link points to a heading that is not exported due to its `noexport' tag. How is that not a "broken link", especially from the point of view of the user who is exporting the document, given the customization is named `org-export-with-broken-links'? P.S. I am not arguing against your view; rather, I am trying to understand your explanation with perfect clarity, to learn. Rudy -- "It is far better to have a question that can't be answered than an answer that can't be questioned." --- Carl Sagan Rudolf Adamkovič <rud...@adamkovic.org> [he/him] http://adamkovic.org
