Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com> writes: > ... due to the similarity with "inline code blocks" (cf. "code > blocks") as well as "special blocks".
.. due to the /relation/ with "inline code blocks" (cf. "code blocks") as well as "special blocks". > But if it were to, I do hope the names of other similar syntactic > terms are similarly updated. But if it were to, I do hope the names of other /related/ syntactic terms are similarly updated. -- Suhail
