On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:54 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmi...@gutov.dev> wrote: > > On 12/12/2023 01:48, João Távora wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:41 PM Dmitry Gutov<dmi...@gutov.dev> wrote: > >> On 12/12/2023 01:35, João Távora wrote: > >>> Or maybe say what the ruby-mode imenu backend > >>> does? > >> Juri just posted a long example of what ruby-mode does (and ruby-ts-mode > >> too) in his last message in this thread. > > OK, and doesn't it answer_your_ question? With Eglot > > > > Method > ModuleExample::ClassExample > instance_method > > Method > ClassExample > class_method > > > > If both methods were named "foo" no problem, right? > > But this doesn't look right: if 'class_method' is in a class called > ModuleExample::ClassExample, shouldn't its entry look like > > Method > ModuleExample::ClassExample > class_method > > as well?
Take it up with the LS. I didn't write it. > And then, if both 'instance_method' and 'class_method' actually are > called 'foo', then we'd have a problem. Bizarrely, you wouldn't have a tree to start with, which probably explains why the devs of the LS Juri is using opted for that layout. > This entry from his message also looks odd: > > Module > > ModuleExample If you can reproduce it, show the repro. João
