Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"

[No Wayman]

And to add:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=adaption%2Cadaptation%2Ccontext%2Cenhancement%2Cenrichment%2Cfeature&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

It appears context is king.
All that aside, I think Ihor's proposal sidesteps the whole issue 
while addressing the complexity of the implementation.