Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: >> Should we then report a bug to cgit mailing list? > > I do not have particular opinion. I rarely use web UI for git and mostly > for blame. I prefer to do it with local clone. I have never read cgit > docs. Perhaps it may be more apparent that it is a merge commit. > > Anyway at first I would ask the savannah team. E.g. vanilla debbugs > instance is significantly more convenient than the GNU ones and the > changes in the latter are intentional. Mhonarc (list archive) at > lists.debian.org has better configuration than at lists.gnu.org as well. > So there might be specific of particular instance.
I asked savannah people, and they pointed out that the commits where, in fact, listed in the logs. Just at their original creating dates - much earlier than the merge commit date and further down into the logs. So, it was mostly my oversight from the very beginning - nothing was lost during the merge process. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
