On 1/17/23, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: >> * one >> ****** two >> >> which seemed slightly relevant to the patch. > > Sorry, but could you further elaborate? What kind of integrity and what > kind of structure editing do you have in mind here?
maybe my comment is too unrelated to the patch, but it just seemed worth raising in the context. to me it feels wrong to have a non-linline-task child entry whose heading is star-indented more levels than needed to denote a child entry. in my own case, it suggests corruption, because i would not deliberately create that. i have encountered it. similarly if org-odd-levels-only is non-nil and there is an even star heading. i have encountered it. confusing to track down. i was merely asking if there was anything in e.g. main or syntax documents etc. that refers to or enforces this. as for active region or transient mark, to me, they are supposed to be transient, unlike, for example, agenda restriction lock, and thus, for example, having to c-g or so to get rid of a highlighted region feels like a bug. there might be exceptions where you pretty much always want to run a command more than once with the region remaining active, perhaps such as a rectange opening type of command, but to me the patch commands do not apply there.
