On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 12:11 PM John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> Would you find it suitable to use [cite/command:pre @key post] in general?
I think it's a reasonable approach that would appeal to some users who
would treat org as a front-end to LaTeX primarily, and obviously
previous org-ref users, and that it's better than supporting this in a
parallel but incompatible syntax.
> For portability, I suppose there could be a defcustom mapping if one wanted
> to leverage the oc-csl library with pretty minimal effort.
Right.
I'm not sure what the precise right solution is, where, but something like that.
oc-biblatex, for example, has the new org-cite-biblatex-styles
defcustom, whose list entries look like:
("author" "caps" "Citeauthor*" nil nil)
So with that, a oc-biblatex user can already do this presumably.
("Citeauthor*" nil "Citeauthor*" nil nil)
But could also have a new org-ref processor with a simpler defcustom like:
("Citeauthor*" . "author/caps")
> I think two things need to be addressed to fix that. First is allowing a * in
> the style/variant section; there are probably 17 or so of these commands in
> natbib/biblatex. Second is fixing org-activate-link so that link activation
> functions don't get called on something like [cite/citet:@key]. This is
> necessary for org-ref and org-cite to co-exist, but also other packages or
> users might also define links like cite:.
+1
Bruce
