Hi Juh, juh <juh+emacs-orgmo...@mailbox.org> writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Am Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 08:31:29PM -0400 schrieb John Kitchin: >> For those who need high fidelity LaTeX export like I do, I think >> org-ref is still a superior solution. For everyone else, and >> especially if you do not need sophisticated cross-references and don't >> want the dependencies of org-ref, org-cite is likely the better >> solution. > > Thank you very much for the clarification. > > I am new to both and I need something that works together with ConTeXt > export. Currently I am happy with org-cite. I used org-ref before but > never got good results in ConTeXt export. So I think that I will stick > wit org-cite. > I used to use ConTeXt and have a healthy respect for it. That feedback is good to hear. > Org-mode is not LaTeX but I wonder if it can be a better replacement for > my Markdown-->Pandoc-->EPUB/ConTeXt single source publication process. > Better as I could make more use of org-roam in my writing process. > May I recommend the mininimal Markdown format, GemText? It has a very simple syntax which is easily convertable into Orgmode syntax. It could be useful for projects where the flow starts with simple written prose. > Though I am a long time emacs user putting all these blocks together is > a challenge, still. > > With your words I now see much much clearer. > > juh Jonathan
