i think i found it useful, long ago, when it was ok/tolerated to change the var, and probably still, to /"do this"/ and /this,/.
although the latter seems weird to me now so i must not now understand what i was doing. i think changing the var was at least in a faq or on worg or so, so it might be needed to compare user's value with standard-value. On 11/17/21, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17/11/2021 04:56, Samuel Wales wrote: >> might be useful to know whether a default regexp change could satisfy >> everybody? in my case i remove " and , from third re. > > Samuel, I have seen your next message, but it still may be helpful to > have an example (for a case if you will meet the problem again). > > These regexps will always fail under some conditions, since it is not > strict markup. An example is emphasis terminated inside link target > > /A link [[https://orgmode.org/?oops=true][Org Mode]] > > On 16/11/2021 14:43, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> Max Nikulin writes: >> >>> Better docs and some restriction on defcustom values were discussed >>> earlier: >>> https://list.orgmode.org/87k0oyd3pw....@nicolasgoaziou.fr/ >>> Nicolas Goaziou. Re: Using backticks for the inline code delimeter? Mon, >>> 19 Apr 2021 11:27:07 +0200 >>> >>> Sorry, I have not prepared a patch. I am not confident with defcustom >>> fine tuning and have not experimented with it since that time. >> >> Maybe something like the attached? > > Thank you, Ihor. Another reason why I have not tried to do it myself is > that it is necessary to test behavior for users who customized markers. > The change should not be fatal for them. I have not checked it with you > patch yet. > > I was considering some way to warn users if improper customization is > detected (unexpected marker is noticed). It should be noticeable to make > user aware of export issues but not too annoying. > >> +The characters in the alist must not be changed. They do not affect >> +the actual Org syntax, just fontification. > > Since this is known point of abuses, maybe stronger words are appropriate. > > Do not change makers and do not add new ones to use custom markers for > existing styles or to introduce new styles. Org syntax is not meant to > be configurable and such modifications will not work with export. If you > are interested in fontification of custom markup inside Emacs only, > there are other ways to achieve desired effect. > > In addition, I do not like the following phrase in the manual: > >> To narrow down the list of available markup syntax, you can customize >> org-emphasis-alist. > > > -- The Kafka Pandemic Please learn what misopathy is. https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html
