On 18/10/2021 16:25, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Sunday, 17 Oct 2021 at 23:35, Max Nikulin wrote:
So

    (setq display-buffer-base-action
         '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-frame)
           (reusable-frames . 0)))

should not be considered as shooting a foot.

I am not sure I understand what you are or are not proposing but org
should not be setting this variable.  This variable is for the "user",
not the package, to set.

I was trying to say that even with such *user* setup, behavior of Org should be reasonable. In particular, with draft patch I posted, *small* org-goto help buffer should not cause appearance of a new frame despite of `display-buffer-base-action' setting cited above, that is suitable for *regular* buffers. User still has opportunity to request arbitrary action for "*Org Help*" buffer through `display-buffer-alist'.

I actually think that org imposes too much of its own view on how
buffers should be managed & displayed.  I am constantly annoyed (and
posted about this recently to the list with no response) that capture
buffers pop up all over the place and it doesn't seem like I have any
control at all.

I agree that behavior of `org-add-note' is extremely intrusive. On the other hand I have no idea concerning its preferred behavior by default.

I do not think that something like `org-src-window-setup' should be introduced for notes and captures. Ideally it should have reasonable behavior by default and should be adjustable through `display-buffer-alist'.

Currently I can not suggest a snippet for `display-buffer-alist' to exclude zoom or teams windows from candidates for `switch-to-buffer-other-window' (that is called from `org-capture').



Reply via email to