On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:46 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> In this situation, the function I want to encourage re-using is
> `org-cite-supported-styles'. `org-cite-basic--complete-style' is so
> trivial that I didn't bother exporting it.
Okay, I see now.
So `org-cite-supported-styles' returns what it sounds like; a list of styles.
((("author" "a")
("caps" "c"))
(("noauthor" "na")
("bare" "b"))
(("nocite" "n"))
(("note" "ft")
("caps" "c")
("bare-caps" "bc"))
(("numeric" "nb"))
(("text" "t")
("caps" "c")
("bare-caps" "bc"))
(("nil")
("caps" "c")
("bare-caps" "bc")
("bare" "b")))
`org-cite-basic--complete-style' is "trivial" just in the sense it
only supports styles (not sub-styles), and one can imagine adding
annotations to make it easier for users to know what a given choice
will result in.
But that's not for you to worry about, or for oc-basic.
I'll think about it; not sure what the best path for a more
feature-full alternative would be ATM.
Bruce
