On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:01 AM Denis Maier <denisma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > Am 27.05.2021 um 03:58 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:47 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> BTW, I did get it all setup, and do seem to have run into a bug. > >> > >> Input: > >> > >> [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p23] > >> > >> Output (not position of the locator label): > >> > >> (p 1993, 23) > > > > Hmm ... experimenting some more, these work correctly. > > > > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion page 23] > > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p. 23] > > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p.23] > > > > Still not sure why the above with the p at the front though. > > I think a plain "p" in front of a number is not recognized as a locator > prefix. > Nicolas's post mentions "page", "p.", "pp." as valid locator terms for > page. So in your case this here seems to apply: "The part of the suffix > before the locator is appended to reference's prefix."
I missed the significance of that last part. What's the use case there Nicolas? Aside from that, a bit more testing this morning, with plain, latex and html is looking good. I got exected output using default and the chicago-note-bibliography-16th-edition.csl style. Bruce
