Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> writes: > Maybe the standardization should cover only the "static" parts of Org > (ie no table formulas, no babel, no agenda, no exporters, etc). However, > in this case, what is left is little more of a markup language with an > editor that allows sections folding. You can have this on top of pretty > much any markup language using Emacs' outline-minor-mode.
It could become stronger competition for asciidoc by being available in more places. Having an acceptance criterion for “supports basic org-mode presentation” and “can edit org-files without breaking editing in org-mode” could help adoption. That would be the only part I’d really expect from standardization: There would be a clear-cut point when a tool could claim compatibility with org level N or by components (i.e. basic presentation, code-blocks, …). Having org-files parsed as html on a VCS-infopage is pretty nice. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
