Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Carsten,
>> Why does org stop with the first match? Efficiency? At least I >> don't care about that, so if this could be made customizable I >> wouldn't object. > > Efficiency, and to avoid cluttering if you have recorded several time > stamps in an entry. See, the problem is that all these lines will > look exactly the same in the agenda, because they all show the same > headline! > > However, I do see that your applications, with a different > time-of-day, does in fact make sense. > > Anyway, get the latest version and do > > (setq org-agenda-find-multiple-timestamps-per-entry t) Carsten, you are incredible! > Question to everyone: Should this be the default? I tend to t. If an entry has more than one timestamp for a day, then it looks like an exception to me. If not, then the entry should have a better structure, i.e. if it was --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Some meeting with Hugo <2009-04-22 Wed> - breakfast <2009-04-22 Wed 09:44> - lunch <2009-04-22 Wed 12:44> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- it should better be: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Some meeting with Hugo <2009-04-22 Wed> ** breakfast <2009-04-22 Wed 09:44> ** lunch <2009-04-22 Wed 12:44> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Or if you don't want the breakfast and lunch in the agenda anyway, one could use 09:44 or an inactive timestamp instead. Bye, Tassilo -- VI VI VI - The Roman Number Of The Beast _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
