Gustavo Barros writes: > Just an user here, but I'd like to leave my +1 to this proposed feature. > [...]
Thanks. That's very useful feedback. > I can add another thought on the matter. While prettify-symbols is a > mode, org-hide-emphasis-markers is an option/variable. So I wonder if > the feature would fit better the current state of things in Org as > either another option/defcustom or by simply expanding the range of > possible values for org-hide-emphasis-markers (e.g. t, nil, > not-at-point, not-at-point-right-edge). But this is just a thought, I'd > be happy to see this feature be included either way. Hmm, yeah, that's worth thinking about. I mentioned eliminating the org-auto-emphasis-unhide-at-point option, but I didn't consider doing it by absorbing the values into org-hide-emphasis-markers and dropping the mode. Given what org-auto-emphasis-mode does underneath, though, it does fit quite neatly into a minor mode toggle.
