> Yes, this `integrate' value is not great, IMO. However, plain lists have > much more in common with headlines than with drawers. > > I still think basic cycling should not include drawers whatsoever. This > is even more true for properties drawers.
I tend to agree about the properties drawers. Cannot come up with a reasonable use-case for such kind of behaviour. However, I have some use-case for cycling user-defined property drawers. In some of my entries, I have long tables storing historical data. These tables tend to be extremely long and I sometimes hide them inside a drawer. Opening these drawers (or a customised list of drawers) on <TAB> would actually make sense for me. Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Hello, > > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Thanks Ihor, I indeed found related code in Org Mode source. I implemented a >>> similar functionality in my patch. >> >> Oh. I somehow missed your first message... >> >> Now, actually adding something to the discussion. >> >> FYI, there is org-cycle-include-plain-lists variable. If it is set to >> 'integrate, plain lists will be included into cycling with point at >> headline. This is against the logic that org-cycle only needs to be >> dealing with headlines. So, I don't see your patch breaking the present >> conventions in org. > > Yes, this `integrate' value is not great, IMO. However, plain lists have > much more in common with headlines than with drawers. > > I still think basic cycling should not include drawers whatsoever. This > is even more true for properties drawers. > > Note that you can already display drawers with `org-cycle', using three > prefix arguments. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou -- Ihor Radchenko, PhD, Center for Advancing Materials Performance from the Nanoscale (CAMP-nano) State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China Email: yanta...@gmail.com, ihor_radche...@alumni.sutd.edu.sg
