On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:24:33PM +0000, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > --- Mar 7/4/09, Cameron Horsburgh <ca...@netcall.com.au> ha scritto: > > I'm trying to get a little more control over my > > DEADLINE and SCHEDULED > > timestamps. > > The manual (8.3 Deadlines and scheduling) states: > > [...] special keywords to facilitate *planning* > > DEADLINE > Meaning: the task (most likely a TODO item, though not > necessarily) is supposed to be finished on that *date*. > > SCHEDULED > Meaning: you are planning to start working on that task on the > given *date*. > > > I think you should use a timestamp > > * Submit :Project_A_ > DEADLINE <2008-10-11> > ** last minute for submission > <2008-10-11 16:59> >
Yes, that's true. However, being able to do this in one timestamp would seem to make a lot of sense. After all, this will show up in my agenda as two apparently unrelated things. Besides, I should only have to put the information in once, not twice. -- Cameron Horsburgh Blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
