Hi, That's a fun coincidence, I ran into this behaviour a couple of days ago as well. For anyone wondering why one would want to comment out their noweb tags but still expect them to result in uncommented code expansion: if one is to edit a source block containing Noweb tags, the emacs mode for that programming language might interpret those tags in an unexpected way and give a messy result, e.g. in my case with LilyPond, mess up the indentation of the rest of the code block.
Luckily, Noweb tag syntax is configurable using org-babel-noweb-wrap-start and org-babel-noweb-wrap-end. Thus, the way I worked around this was to define, for the file containing LilyPond code blocks, org-babel-noweb-wrap-start as "%<<", % being LilyPond's comment symbol. But I still wonder if there is a better way. Cheers, Johannes On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 04:10, Vladimir Nikishkin <lockyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, everyone > > I have the following case: > > #+name: test1 > #+begin_src shell > LINE to comment > LINE to not comment > #+end_src > > #+begin_src shell > #<<test1>> > #+end_src > > When I expand it, I get: > #LINE to comment > #LINE to not comment > > That's not entirely what I want. Can this behaviour be switched off somehow? > > -- > Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin >
