I just thought that practically speaking, I no interpreter should really need stdin, right? Since everything that is prepended with a shebang: #! interpreter is at the same time a valid shell script, isn't it?
сб, 18 янв. 2020 г. в 13:02, Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com>: > > Vladimir Nikishkin <lockyw...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Is it true that ob-scheme doesn't support :stdin <blockname>? > > > > I just tried, and doesn't seem to work, although it works with ob-shell. > > > > (This is not a complaint, I just would like to confirm that I > > understand things correctly.) > > Yes, that's true as far as I can tell: > > $ git grep :stdin > lisp/ob-awk.el:;; - :stdin takes an Org data or code block reference, the > value of > lisp/ob-awk.el: (stdin (let ((stdin (cdr (assq :stdin params)))) > lisp/ob-sed.el: (stdin (let ((stdin (cdr (assq :stdin params)))) > lisp/ob-shell.el: (stdin (let ((stdin (cdr (assq :stdin params)))) > testing/examples/ob-awk-test.org:#+begin_src awk :stdin genseq :results > silent > testing/examples/ob-sed-test.org: #+BEGIN_SRC sed :stdin ex1 > > So it seems support for :stdin is limited to awk, sed, and shell. -- Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin
