Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> stardiviner <numbch...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So I have to consider a safer and larger method to upgrade link. I can't
>> manually open every Org files and run linter on them.
>
> I already offered a function for replacing it in a file. You can wrap it
> within a `dolist' on `directory-files-recursively'.
Hmm, I will randomly copy some files on my disk to do a separate test out.
>
>> (Maybe linter can run on Org files automatically in programtically
>> way?)
>
> When not called interactively, it returns a non-nil value if any error
> is found. And you can call it on a limited set of checkers. Though,
> I think the function I provided is better.
I see. you're right.
>
>> Seems I can wait for better solution now.
>
> I don't see any other solution.
Hmmmmm......
Let me go back to check out your commit. So that I can settle my heart down. :)
>
> Regards,
--
[ stardiviner ]
I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express.
Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3
