Hi, I couldn't reproduce it with emacs -Q and a freshly built version of
org source code.    At some point (make-string (car ev) ?\-) on line 2956
of org-table.el was being called with an argument that was a
non-integer-formatted value, namely 570.0.

But since I can't reproduce it at all now this is presumably an entirely
transient issue!

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:07 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I got an error when debugging the behaviour of a formula.
> >
> > You'll need:
> >
> > (setq org-table-formula-debug t)
> >
> > Then with any luck this should allow you to reproduce the error: C-c C-c
> to run formula.
> >
> > | Task                  | Estimated Effort |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | INTRODUCTION          | 9:30             |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | BACKGROUND            |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | FOO WORKFLOW          |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | BAR WORKFLOW          |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | BAZ WORKFLOW          |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | ADDITIONAL WORKFLOWS  | 1d 4h 0min       |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | FINDINGS              |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS   | 24:00            |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | DISCUSSION            |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | BIBLIOGRAPHY          |                  |
> > |-----------------------+------------------|
> > | Appendix: Status      |                  |
> > | TOTAL WORKDAYS NEEDED | 5d 5h 30min      |
> >
> > #+TBLFM: @>$2='(org-duration-from-minutes (apply '+ (map 'list
> 'org-duration-to-minutes (list @I+1$2 @II+1$2 @III+1$2 @IIII+1$2 @IIIII+1$2
> @IIIIII+1$2 @IIIIIII+1$2 @IIIIIIII+1$2))))
> >
> > I've attached a patch that fixes the problem for me.
>
> I cannot reproduce the problem. Could you explain why you do need this
> patch?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>

Reply via email to