Hello, I came across this problem today (or maybe it is intended but I couldn't find any explanation in the docs). There is an inconsistency on how inline/anonymous and named footnotes are exported in HTML. For example, with the following source:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #+TITLE: Testing footnotes #+LANGUAGE: en Testing[fn::test1] footnotes[fn:2] [fn:2] test2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Exports to this : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- <h2 class="footnotes">Footnotes: </h2> <div id="text-footnotes"> <div class="footdef"><sup><a id="fn.1" class="footnum" href="#fnr.1">1</a></sup> <div class="footpara">test1</div></div> <div class="footdef"><sup><a id="fn.2" class="footnum" href="#fnr.2">2</a></sup> <div class="footpara"><p class="footpara"> test2 </p></div></div> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- We can see here that the named footnote creates a paragraph of the same class as the parent container "footpara" whereas the inlined one doesn't create this. If this is intended, why? If not, which is the intended one? Reagards. -- Matthias Paulmier