Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Currently if you do M-RET in a checkbox list item, the next item does not >> become a checkbox automatically. This patch fixes that. >> >> I have been using this fix locally for few months. But never got to >> submitting it as I need to yet write a test for it. >> >> Does that patch look good (apart from missing tests). Should I format it >> w.r.t to next? or master? > > IMO, there is nothing to fix. Inserting a checkbox in every item is not > mandatory. > > Furthermore, currently, M-RET inserts a regular item and M-S-RET inserts > it with a checkbox. With your patch, both M-RET and M-S-RET do the same > thing, which is sub-optimal. > > My vote is to keep the current behaviour.
I agree. I use lists with mixed checkboxes and no checkboxes and do not want to enforce checkboxes on every list item. Thanks, Bernt
