Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 5:35 PM Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> > wrote: > >> >> Would there be any consideration for an inline syntax that looks more >> like a link? Personally, when I want inline TODOs, I want them because >> there's a particular chunk of text that I need to do something with. >> What about something that looks like: >> >> In 2005 there were approximately [[TODO: Verify this; SCHEDULED: >> <tomorrow>; :statistics:][4,500]] Confucius Institutes in operation >> worldwide. >> > > How would you distinguish between regular links and such inline TODO's when > the "link" portion is hidden? > > Would footnotes serve better? (I'm not a consumer of inline todos (yet?) so > consider this suggestion with a grain of salt :))
I’d also prefer that. I have often used inline tasks for long discussions. One downside would be that it would move the tast contents further away from the main contents it’s discussing. E.g. I have used it for discussions with co-authors and I think they’d maybe find footnotes confusing. For just me, footnotes TODOS would be great. Note, you can also have inline todos: [[TODO::Inline todo text]]. Rasmus -- Vote for proprietary math!
