Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > You used the word 'discrepancy',
True. I inferred it from (funny enough, some org elements have 'value' as their content, others 'content'). which, IMO, sounds like it is a surprising fact. > I simply needed to know for each org > element what is interpreted and what not. And some have a content, > others a :value. As in every AST, some nodes are terminal (no contents), and some are not (contents). This distinction is made in `org-element-greater-elements', i.e., non-terminal elements. See also `org-element-recursive-objects' for non-terminal objects. > So if I pass 'Hello World' as content to an example > block, nothing happens, if I pass it via :value, it appears as the > blocks ... well, content. Contents imply Org syntax. This would defeat the purpose of an example block.
