Nico,
ah, thanks!
not wanting to look gift horses, etc., but i've a question. if i
understand the change correctly
----
- (looking-at "\\<call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
+ (looking-at "call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
----
now something like "oncall_foo()" will be taken as "on" followed by the
inline results of call_foo(). is that right? (testing, seems to be.)
i worry that might be a bit too lenient. sometimes one might want
"oncall_foo()" to stay as "oncall_foo()". (that's why i was thinking of
some, hmm, "non-spacing break", like the string "{{{}}}", or, well,
almost anything, "\.", "\#", "#" -- maybe the cleanest? -- ...)
cheers, Greg
