Aloha all
Peter Davis writes:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
I think you are missing the point. Free software is primarily
about
source code (the four definitions).
If we refuse to provide useful information just because it
violates some
purist idea of what is or is not acceptably unencumbered, then
we’re
just denying users potential helpful capabilities that may make
the
difference between using org-mode or abandoning it completely in
favor
of some commercial, cross-platform solution.
IIUC, the question is about where to provide this information, not
whether or not to provide it. OP asked about putting it in the
Org manual and Nicolas has pointed out that the manual is for
documenting Org software.
Perhaps Worg is a better place to provide information about BeOrg?
hth,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com