Hello, Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popin...@gmail.com> writes:
> Actually, looking at org-datetree.el, the several regex here do not take > possible tags into account, so this is expected. > > So my question: would it make sense to enhance datetrees entries with > optional tags? > Or would that introduce some kind of inconsistency elsewhere? It's probably an omission in "org-datetree.el". Do you want to provide a patch for that (along with a couple of tests)? Thank you, Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
