Aloha Adrian, Adrian Bradd writes: > > I support the move to manual.org. If there are concerns about the > quality of the manual.org file and its exported .texi manual that > prevent it from becoming the master source one could ask contributors to > add information to both the .texi and .org file until the final > conversion is made. At the very least this would prevent an individual > from taking all the load. > > Was there resistance to the move to manual.org previously? Or was the > issue one of apathy?
I don't know exactly. I think there were legitimate concerns at the time that manual.org required more work to produce a standard org.texi, and some doubt whether it would indeed be possible. I don't think apathy was a factor. IIRC, there was a lot of support for the idea, including Carsten's hope that Org mode could "eat it's own dog food." All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
