Hello, "José L. Doménech" <domenechjo...@gmail.com> writes:
> No, but I don't know what is the preferred format for the entries. So > instead of a patch i send the complete entries. OK. > ***** Scheme: new function: ~org-babel-scheme-table-or-string~ > > New helper function to convert the return value from the scheme block > to a table or a string. I think this can be kept as an internal function, and named `org-babel-scheme--table-or-string'. > * lisp/ob-scheme.el (org-babel-scheme-null-to): New custom option that > allows to use a empty list or null symbol to format the table > output, initially assigned to 'hlines. * lisp/ob-scheme.el (org-babel-scheme-null-to): New variable. is sufficient in this case. > (org-babel-scheme-table-or-string): New helper function to convert > the return value from the block to a table or a string. Likewise: "New function." > +(defun org-babel-scheme-table-or-string (results) Per above, I suggest to name it `org-babel-scheme--table-or-string' and update the code accordingly. I made the changes suggested above and added a "TINYCHANGE" cookie at the end of the commit message since I don't know I you signed the FSF papers already. I you haven't, please consider doing it. Thank you! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
