Hello, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:
> Seems fine. To me, "n" or "N" would be a better name for the macro, as > that suggests some sort of number, whereas "c" doesn’t really associated > with "counter" to me. Perhaps it’s just because the syntax looks a lot > like the R combine command... "n" seems better indeed. Not sure about "N" > Are there a lot of cases where it would not be able to just configure how > heading numbers are printed in the backend? I don't know there are a lot of cases, but there are definitely some: * Definition * Property * Example 1 * Property * Example 2 then you realize you want to demonstrate the second property before the first one... Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
