Hello, Chunyang Xu <m...@xuchunyang.me> writes:
> Here is a patch which can fix the issue. Thank you. > From e42b22f74c2f04a4d8e7eec0a6bdacbd08bebf12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Chunyang Xu <m...@xuchunyang.me> > Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:46:51 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] ob-C: Fix remote executing > > * lisp/ob-C.el (org-babel-C-execute): Process remote bin file. > > TINYCHANGE > --- > lisp/ob-C.el | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lisp/ob-C.el b/lisp/ob-C.el > index 795bcb2b7..e54e17492 100644 > --- a/lisp/ob-C.el > +++ b/lisp/ob-C.el > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ or `org-babel-execute:C++' or `org-babel-execute:D'." > (org-babel-eval > (pcase org-babel-c-variant > ((or `c `cpp) > - (concat tmp-bin-file cmdline)) > + (concat (org-babel-process-file-name tmp-bin-file) cmdline)) I see that `tmp-bin-file' is used a couple other times in the body. Would it make sense to wrap the initial binding within `org-babel-process-file-name' instead of doing it only for this occurrence? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
