Hi Nicolas, Thank you for your time. I really appreciate it.
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:41:34 +0900, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Yasushi SHOJI <ya...@atmark-techno.com> writes: > > > I assume that the key phrase is "anywhere Org markup is recognized". > > Link format doesn't allow Org markup, right? > > Not in the first part indeed. You can, however, use a macro in the > description part of the link. OK. > > # I use file_name_with_underscore.txt more than subscripts > > # I'd be nice, at least for me, to have '\sub' and '\super' special keywords > > # but leave the underscores alone. > > I don't understand where you need this. At the export level, you can use > `org-export-with-sub-superscripts' to `{}'. At display level, you can do > the same with `org-use-sub-superscripts'. I hate to waste your precious time because of my ignorant and I can live with '\under' but I'm totally lost. Are you saying that it's possible to generate "a_20170307.txt" from "a_{{{timestamp}}}.txt" if I set those variables mentioned above correctly? without using '\under'? I know you said it's ambiguous. So let me clarify what I said. What I said above was to change the syntax (or lex / parser's behavior) when some variable, let's say 'org-do-not-parse-sub-superscripts', is set to nil. So that a) org leaves '_' in "a_{{{somemacro}}}" as-is and the macro parser will pickup the "{{{somemacro}}}, b) when I want to use subscript, I can write "a\sub{someword or two}" to make a subscript. People like me don't use subscript much (to be honest, I've never wanted to use subscript since I started use Org, seven years?), but use '_' many times in a doc. Hence, (setq org-use-sub-superscripts nil) in my init.el. But for someone wanting to use subscripts in rare occasion, '\sub' would serve. I can understand if you say it's not good idea to change the _syntax_ by a variable. > > hmm. just checked the source. org-use-sub-superscripts is only for > > display. > > org-export-with-sub-superscripts is just for exports. > > See above. > > > I was gonna just by-pass or disable subscript parser all together when > > org-use-sub-superscripts is nil but it doesn't seems to be a good > > idea, does it? > > This is exactly what a nil `org-export-with-sub-superscripts' does. If that's the case, why doesn't macro parser pickup the "{{{timestamp}}}" in "a_{{{timestamp}}}"? Maybe this is my confusing point? The component resposible defining the org "syntax" is different from the parser? Even if sub/super parser is by-passed, because the "syntax" is subscript, the macro parser won't be called on this substring? Is the syntax defined in org-element--object-regexp and org-element--object-lex? Thanks, -- yashi