* On Fri 03:53PM +0000, 06 Feb 2009, Carsten Dominik (domi...@science.uva.nl) wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a table where one column consists of inactive dates, such as > > this: > > > > | Date | OK? | > > |------------------+-----| > > | [2009-01-30 Fri] | x | > > | [2009-01-27 Tue] | x | > > | [2009-01-28 Wed] | x | > > > > I can't sort the table by that column. If I change the dates to > > active, then > > sorting (by time) works fine. Is this behavior intentional? > > > Yes, intentional, because the same routine also does sorting of > entries and should prefer active time stamps. However, I realize that > we can still look for an inactive time stamp when no active one can be > found. I just pushed this change.
Thank you for this change; it works great! -- Best, Hsiu-Khuern. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
