Hello, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 11/27/16, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: >> I pushed a few more fixed in plain time-stamps and deadlines. Please >> report if you find anything suspicious. > > please try this: > > SCHEDULED: <2016-09-17 Sat .+2d> > > emacs -Q, with a 2-day span and show-all nil. [...] > in org 9: > > 1] it shows on both days > 2] it shows 72x > > re 1, dunno if this was intended? It is. It shows first repeat. I assume you tested that yesterday, so you got the repeat for today. Since the repeat didn't trigger "today" (which is actually yesterday), it also displays a reminder for the scheduled item there. So, you have "72x" on "today" and a new repeat on the next day. > re 2, org 9 is trying to do its counting from the original timestamp > date. i can understand the reasoning here, but do not want it for my > use case. It is, per 1-year old commit (3072cb28e8627066f465f1a4af85da88135d0549). Details are given here: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/101884>. > 72x gets buried. it's a sudden pop up then a sudden drop off. i want > a gradual bubbling down like in org 8. a .+30d repeater should show > today, then tomorrow it should show 2x, then the next day it should > show 3x. > > org 8 is nicer for showing the fact that 2d ago you were reminded to > do it, and maybe did it but did not doneify or maybe were not able to > do it. it bubbles down slowly. It's difficult to solve both problems. In any case, this will not happen in Org 9.0. I think the main problem is that you put too many things behind `org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all'. Its name is misleading. I think we need a new variable, or to change this one, to have both behaviours possible. Suggestions (and docstrings) are welcome, we can implement them in master branch. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
