Hello, "Bruce V. Chiarelli" <mano...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-10-31 17:04 GMT-07:00 Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>: >> Does adding the following branch in the `cond' above, before the >> catch-all one, solve the issue? >> >> ((eq origin-cat 'after) (match-end 0)) > > It does! Wonderful. Applied. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou