Hello,

"Bruce V. Chiarelli" <mano...@gmail.com> writes:

> 2016-10-31 17:04 GMT-07:00 Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:

>> Does adding the following branch in the `cond' above, before the
>> catch-all one, solve the issue?
>>
>>   ((eq origin-cat 'after) (match-end 0))
>
> It does! Wonderful.

Applied. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to