On 2016-10-11 10:56, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> I suspect that it will be a long time before hierarchical proofs gain
> much popularity though, given that Lamport has been talking about them
> since at least the 90's, and I haven't seen one "in the wild" yet.

Depends how much you're willing to stretch the definition.  Many 
machine-checked proofs are written in a pretty hierarchical style, and some of 
the associated tools support folding and expanding subproofs (see the middle 
gif in 
https://github.com/cpitclaudel/company-coq/#outlines-code-folding-and-jumping-to-definition).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to