If I evaluate this: #+name: myfun1 #+begin_src clojure (defn myfun1 [ ] 9) #+end_src
#+RESULTS: myfun1 : #'clojure-noob.core/myfun1 then this #+begin_src clojure (inc (myfun1)) #+end_src #+RESULTS: : 10 I've got the right answer, but I've totally bypassed the :var functionality. In my elisp example #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var myx=(mylist1) (mapcar '1+ myx) #+end_src #+RESULTS: | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | it seems to be as you say, i.e., the function needs to be evaluated, and, yes, the mylist1 function in parens does the trick. But this #+begin_src clojure :var i=(myfun1) (inc i) #+end_src produces this in *Messages*: eval: Symbol’s function definition is void: myfun1 However, this #+name: myfun1-test2 #+begin_src clojure (myfun1) #+end_src #+RESULTS: myfun1-test2 : 9 does finally get seen and evaluated: #+begin_src clojure :var i=myfun1-test2 (inc i) #+end_src #+RESULTS: : 10 But this adds an extra step just to use :var. I'm guessing regular Lisp and maybe Scheme (geiser) know about var i=(myfun1), . Will test, but I've got to swap out my .emacs.d first. As far as noweb is concerned, doing <<myfun1>> doesn't win me anything, does it? It's the same as (myfun1) above. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: > Aloha Lawrence, > > I don't know the Clojure dialect, but I think the problem is that the > myfun1 source code block returns a function. It doesn't evaluate > the function and return a result, which is I think what you are > expecting. > > You can use noweb expansion of myfun1 to define the function inside > another source code block, then use the function in the normal way in > the source code block (or in the session, if you have that set). > > Or, you might change the myfun1 source code block to return a list, > rather than a function (if I'm reading Clojure correctly): > > #+name: myfun1 > #+begin_source clojure > [8 9] > #+end_source > > hth, > Tom > > Lawrence Bottorff writes: > > > Not sure if you know Clojure, but here's what I've been toying with: > > > > #+name: my-test > > #+begin_src clojure :var i=[1 2] > > (map inc i) > > #+end_src > > > > #+RESULTS: my-test > > | 2 | 3 | > > > > looks good, but then > > > > #+name: myfun1 > > #+begin_src clojure > > (defn myfun1 > > [ ] > > [8 9]) > > #+end_src > > > > #+begin_src clojure :var i=myfunc1 > > (map inc i) > > #+end_src > > > > doesn't do anything, i.e., it doesn't process the myfunc1 and provide the > > vector [8 9] > > > > This elisp code works, though: > > > > #+name: mylist1 > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > > (defun mylist1 () > > (list 1 2 3 4)) > > #+end_src > > > > then > > > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var myx=(mylist1) > > (mapcar '1+ myx) > > #+end_src > > > > #+RESULTS: > > | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | > > > > Note how I put mylist1 in parens. Without produced odd output > > > > #+RESULTS: > > | 110 | 122 | 109 | 106 | 116 | 117 | 50 | > > > > . . . which is literally taking the ascii letters of the word "mylist1" > and > > incrementing them. (Too much fun. . . ). What might be wrong with my > > Clojure attempt? I've tried (myfun1), myfun1, and myfun1() gives an > error. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: > > > >> Aloha Lawrence, > >> > >> Lawrence Bottorff writes: > >> > >> > So I can run code for a REPL-type language like Clojure in a babel > code > >> > block and get "results," e.g., a Clojure code block takes in a vector > of > >> > mappings and produces new "results": > >> > > >> > #+RESULTS[abc5c51bb569a82c19c4eea1c385c74e839922c7]: > >> > symmetrize-body-parts-test > >> > | :name | head | :size | 3 | > >> > | :name | left-eye | :size | 1 | > >> > | :name | right-eye | :size | 1 | > >> > | :name | left-ear | :size | 1 | > >> > . . . > >> > > >> > but could I generate results that aren't just static output listed > after > >> a > >> > #+RESULTS tag, rather, embedded in a newly created babel code block? > I'd > >> > like such output "initialized" as far as the running REPL is concerned > >> too. > >> > Is it possible to generate new code/data that is immediately known to > the > >> > REPL session? Any examples don't have to be Clojure. > >> > >> You can use the :session header argument which will give you access to > >> any variables created during the session: > >> > >> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob- > >> doc-clojure.html#orgheadline13 > >> > >> You can pass the function results to a variable argument, which makes > >> possible chaining (see http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i03): > >> > >> #+header: :var x=myfunc(2) > >> > >> You can also embed and call a function in a source code block using > noweb > >> syntax: > >> > >> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html# > literate-programming > >> > >> hth, > >> Tom > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas S. Dye > >> http://www.tsdye.com > >> > > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com >
