Hello, Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes:
> If I have many headers in a document, it is easy to loose the overview > for me. > > So I started to use drawers: > > :OPTIONS: > ... > :END: > > :LATEX: > .... > :END: > > :BABEL: > ... > :END: > > and have only the "standard" content type options open (DESCRIPTION, > KEYWORDS, SUBTITLE, DATE, AUTHOR, ...) > > Would this be something to include into the templates which can be > inserted (C-e C-L #)? This would make it much easier to work with these > options. Do you suggest that `org-export-insert-default-template' should group options within drawers by default? If so, I'm not too keen of the idea of imposing drawers to the user. Besides, templates are already separated by back-end so you can insert them within pre-created drawers already. There is no "babel" or "options" category, though. I guess we could create them, if needed. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
