Hello, Don March <d...@donmarch.net> writes:
> You're right about both things. I updated the patch, and also added an > example to the manual. If that's not what you had it mind, let me know > or feel free to edit. Thank you. I used (not (time-less-p (current-time) time)) as suggested instead, so as to take into consideration the (granted, highly unlikely) case of time equality, and pushed to master. Would you mind providing a note about this change in ORG-NEWS? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
