Hello, Arun Isaac <arunis...@systemreboot.net> writes:
>> 2. Require preparation functions to accept one parameter, the project >> plist. > > I think adding project-plist as a parameter to preparation functions is > definitely more elegant. Done in 5cd793c. > But, I also came across this old thread where it was noted that making > project-plist a proper parameter, instead of it being dynamically scoped > into the preparation function, would break a lot of code. Bad code deserves to be broken anyway. More seriously, the fix is trivial, so I don't think this is an issue. Thank you for the feedback. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
