John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: > That sounds fine to me. Would you then use > > :lexical nil
Sure. However, Babel uses "yes" and "no" as booleans so we also need to support these. nil and t are fine too, obviously. You would need to define a new defconst `org-babel-header-args:emacs-lisp' to specify allowed values for :lexical. Also, this should probably be documented somewehere. Regards,
