Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdia...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 13:56, Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> wrote: >> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdia...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 10:12, Marcin Borkowski <mb...@mbork.pl> wrote: >>>> On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> I had no idea Firefox did this... >>>>> >>>>> ...You're not the only one... >>>> >>>> Me too, thanks for that tip!!! >>> >>> Add another one. :-) >>> >>> That said, though, I am finding the behavior of KeySnail's hok's very >>> flexible (follow the link, open multiple links in tabs, open link in a tab >>> and switch to it, open in a tab but do not switch to it, open in a new >>> window, copy the link, save [download] the link, etc). >> >> Hok, the history search plugin, and the download manager plugin are all > > Eric, do you mean the dlbsnail and S3.dlbsnail? Or do you mean the > "LinkDownloads"? The last one I've not been able to get to work (seems to > do nothing).
I only installed the dlbsnail, and I think it works okay. > In fact, after these couple of days of usage, I have tweaked the config so > that most of my muscle memory with Conkeror does not need to be > changed. But the download thing is still not great because when I try to > save something I am eventually offered one of those dreaded pop-up > file-explorer-like windows. > > In contrast, with Conkeror after typing a key (s) and the hint, in the > bottom mini-buffer like I can use common Emacs keybindings to modify > path, names, etc. > > Am I am missing something? Not so far as I know -- the open-file dialogue is probably the biggest remaining annoyance for me, as well. I did like the Emacs-like minibuffer thing that Conkeror had. Apart from that, though, this setup is fairly Conkeror like. Just faster, and with fewer mysterious silent crashes!
