Hello, Skip Collins <skip.coll...@gmail.com> writes:
> I added this line to the top of my org file: > #+OPTIONS: broken-links:t > > But that eliminates both the link and its description from the export. > Changing it from 't' to 'mark' puts a BROKEN LINK message in the > output. I suggest adding a new option 'pass' that would simply pass > "broken" links verbatim into the output. Not that I'm against the idea, but wouldn't it be a poor way to properly fix the issue, i.e., add new link types? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
