Hi Nick, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
[snip: Loris' whinging and Karl's response (24 lines)] >> However, I still don't like the long #+TBLFM, although it's not going to >> kill me. >> > > That's good, because I think you'll have to live with it :-) > > There is support for multiple TBLFM lines, but not in the way you want: > they are alternatives, rather than cumulative - see > > (info "(org) Editing and debugging formulas") > > the section entitled "Using multiple #+TBLFM lines". I was aware of this and have found it useful. However, it seems a little inconsistent that some options, like '#+OPTIONS' or '#+LATEX_HEADER', are cumulative whereas others, like '#+TBLFM', are not. Is there a logic to this that I am overlooking? If not, is there an overview of how the different options behave? Cheers, Loris -- This signature is currently under construction.