On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:51 PM, <pray...@unimelb.edu.au> wrote: > Hi John, almost solves the problem, the catch is entries like: > ** Norton my office <2015-03-11 Wed 10:00 +1w> > The date range searches in either the sparse tree or the tag-property > match searches don't seem to calculate out repeating dates ... fair > enough that's probably quite an overhead. I'll look at adding a filter > for active timestamps to agenda filtering. > regards > Peter
Ah, you said as much in the original message, but with not seeing the explicit format (with the +1w), the phrase "repeated entries" wasn't ringing a bell and I missed your aim. Sorry about that! I think your current search should only pull active timestamps, right? It'll miss the repeated ones, but when I run the same agenda query in your original post, I only get hits for the active timestamped entries in my example above. Good luck! John
