Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > ... > Without these fixes, I get an error like: Wrong number of arguments: setq, 1 >
I don't. Version info: Org-mode version 8.3.2 (release_8.3.2-380-g64aee4 @ /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.15) of 2015-08-16 on alphaville.usersys.redhat.com > I am not familiar with letrec but for let statements, if I want to set > a let-bound variable X's value to nil, I would do, > > (let (X) ..) > > or > > (let ((X nil)) ..) > > But NOT (let ((X)) ..) (Note the parentheses count). > > > Do the same rules not apply to letrec? They do not: letrec takes a list, each element of which is a list (SYMBOL VALUEFORM) - but afaik, an empty VALUEFORM sets the SYMBOL to nil. let takes a VARLIST, each element of which is a symbol *or* a list (SYMBOL VALUEFORM). See their docstrings. > > Here is my org-version: > > Org-mode version 8.3.2 (release_8.3.2-380-g64aee4 @ > /home/kmodi/usr_local/apps/6/emacs/emacs-25/share/emacs/site-lisp/org/) > > Here is my emacs build info (emacs-25 branch): > > Emacs version: GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ > Version 2.24.23) > of 2015-12-10, built using commit d75849e937af0ecbcdc7bf621aa9bcd43aa75df4. > My org is the same as yours, but my emacs is a few months old: maybe some recent change screwed up something. -- Nick
