On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: > Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > >> Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > OK, one more, again a repeat of an old request. > >> > > >> > Pandoc Markdown has this incredibly easy way to specify html > attributes ( > >> > http://pandoc.org/README.html#header-identifiers): > >> > > >> > ---- > >> > # My Header {#myid .class1 .class2} > >> > ---- > >> > > >> > I find this much easier to read, write, and maintain than the org-mode > >> > equivalent: > >> > > >> > #+ATTR_HTML: :id myid :class class1 class2 > >> > * My Header > >> > >> Does this do what you want? > >> > >> * my header > >> :PROPERTIES: > >> :CUSTOM_ID: myid > >> :HTML_CONTAINER_CLASS: class1 class2 > >> :END: > >> > > I guess so. It still seems much "heavier" to me than the pandoc syntax, > > which I find much easier to read and write, > > It's also more explicit. And if you use Emacs for authoring your .org > documents, you can use the C-c C-x p interface for fast insertion. >
Yes, that's true and I see the advantages, I just still prefer a shorthand; it's easier to look at and for me at least, less distracting to write. > > You didn't write to the list. > thx. > > -- > The second rule of Fight Club is: You do not talk about Fight Club >
