On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote:

> Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote:
> >
> >> Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > OK, one more, again a repeat of an old request.
> >> >
> >> > Pandoc Markdown has this incredibly easy way to specify html
> attributes (
> >> > http://pandoc.org/README.html#header-identifiers):
> >> >
> >> > ----
> >> > # My Header {#myid .class1 .class2}
> >> > ----
> >> >
> >> > I find this much easier to read, write, and maintain than the org-mode
> >> > equivalent:
> >> >
> >> > #+ATTR_HTML: :id myid :class class1 class2
> >> > * My Header
> >>
> >> Does this do what you want?
> >>
> >> * my header
> >> :PROPERTIES:
> >> :CUSTOM_ID: myid
> >> :HTML_CONTAINER_CLASS: class1 class2
> >> :END:
> >>
> > I guess so. It still seems much "heavier" to me than the pandoc syntax,
> > which I find much easier to read and write,
>
> It's also more explicit.  And if you use Emacs for authoring your .org
> documents, you can use the C-c C-x p interface for fast insertion.
>

Yes, that's true and I see the advantages, I just still prefer a shorthand;
it's easier to look at and for me at least, less distracting to write.

>
> You didn't write to the list.
>

thx.

>
> --
> The second rule of Fight Club is: You do not talk about Fight Club
>

Reply via email to