Hi Puneeth, Thanks for the followup.
Puneeth Chaganti <puncha...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: >> It's not obvious that org should change a—potentially—carefully selected >> narrowed region. > > I agree. But, am I not explicitly asking to jump to the specified > item. I don't mind the widening, at least when the call is > interactive. I agree with you when some other code is calling it, > though. I see your point, but I also remember being quite annoyed in the past when I lost my narrow because of e.g. inserting a footnote. >> Perhaps you could mimic the way org-edit-special works for this case. > > You mean, display the entry in a new buffer, and any changes will be > applied onto the original entry too? Yeah, I would prefer that. Would that work for you or would still prefer to have your buffer widened? Thanks, Rasmus -- I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day
