Hello, Leonard Randall <leonard.a.rand...@gmail.com> writes:
> I have my thesis divided into several chapters each with its own org file. > I was trying to use org's Include function to compile a pdf of the complete > draft using a master file. However, I found that if there was more than one > reference to the same footnote in one of my chapter files, the exporter > would complain that a footnote was undefined. > [...] > Suppose this is the master file: > > ---- Begin Master.org --- > * Here is my master file > It has an include command. > #+INCLUDE: "./Included.org" > --- End Master.org --- > > If I try to export this file it will throw up an error with either one of > the following include files. > --- begin Included.org --- > #+EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexp archive notes > #+ARCHIVE: ::* Archived > * This is a headline. > > This is some text. [fn:dd1cd1f9] > * Archive :archive: > ** This is a headline (draft 0) > Here is a previous version of the text to which I affixed the same > footnote. [fn:dd1cd1f9] > * Footnotes > > [fn:dd1cd1f9] Here is the footnote Fixed. Thank you. > --- begin Included.org --- > * This is a headline. > This is some text. [fn:dd1cd1f9] > > Here is some more text to which I wish to affix the same footnote. > [fn:dd1cd1f9] This is a footnote /definition/ since it starts at column 0. > * Footnotes > > [fn:dd1cd1f9] Here is a footnote This is a second footnote definition for the same label. Syntax is too much faulty for a clean export. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
